Reflections from an Unscripted Walk – Andersens Kaffeetasse 2025/11 (Andersen’s Coffee Cup)
How Perception Becomes Inverted
During a quiet walk, a thought appeared: that we often approach the world from the wrong direction. What seems large becomes insignificant. What is small becomes dominant. We treat details as if they were the whole, and overlook the larger movements that shape our lives.
This reflection unfolded spontaneously, without preparation. Its rhythm follows the way thinking moves when it is not forced into structure: shifting perspectives, revisiting fragments, testing the weight of an idea by circling it. The original recording exists in German only, but its content touches on questions that are relevant far beyond language.
At the centre lies a simple observation:
We live inside an inverted model of the world.
The micro-level appears enormous.
The macro-level disappears.
Digital fragments are treated as reality, while the analogue field from which they are carved remains largely unseen. Experts who master details are celebrated as if they understood the entire system, while those who speak about the larger frame are treated as abstract or imprecise. This inversion shapes not only perception, but also responsibility. It defines whom we expect to act, and on where we focus our attention.
The Role of Detail, Scale and the Middle Layer
The reflection also addresses the cultural coding of capitalism, the shifting use of the pronoun we, and the way societies protect their comfortable middle layers while distancing themselves from both foundations and consequences. These are not analytical arguments; they are movements of thought that arise in real time, following the structure of perception rather than the structure of theory.
Connection to the Conceptual System of ausderLiebe
The ideas resonate with the conceptual system presented on ausderLiebe.com. They touch on themes such as:
– permeability and blocked perception
– world recognition
– perspective and scale
– reversibility and return
– the function of the middle level in modern societies
Why an English Reflection Becomes Necessary
Although the recording itself remains in German, its content reveals a growing need for a space in which these reflections can be explored internationally. The way people relate to world-models, perception, meaning and responsibility is not confined to one language.
The interest from international readers suggests that an English-language format—whether spoken, written, or hybrid—may become necessary. Not as a translation of existing work, but as an expansion of the resonance field: a place where new thinking can unfold in English in its own rhythm.
For now, the German episode remains accessible through the project’s audio platform. Its English presence begins here: as text, as reflection, and as an invitation to follow the movement of thought across languages.
English Translation of the Transcript
Andersens Kaffeetasse 2025/11 – Transcript (Translated from German)
I had a thought just now. One of those rare thoughts one wants to hold on to. Most thoughts are not like that. And many of the thoughts we do preserve end up building structures no one needs.
I have the impression that we often look at things from the wrong direction – especially the larger themes. We see the world as if in an inverted image: everything above us appears huge, unreachable, and yet we consider it strangely unimportant. Instead, we direct our attention to the next smaller level, to the structures directly in front of us.
There we search for what is “big,” and we treat detailed knowledge as if it were knowledge of the whole. The experts who dig deeply into tiny structures appear to be those who have “understood the world.” But the world they understand is small. And because we treat this smallness as large, we lose sight of what actually is.
Take the analogue and the digital. The analogue is treated as something small, old, past. The digital as something large, modern, forward. But the digital is only a narrow section cut out of the analogue – the part we can measure. And we can measure only what we have instruments for, and what we choose to measure. Everything else remains unobserved, even though it is the far larger field.
In this way we miss what is essential, and elevate the non-essential into something significant.
When someone becomes exceptionally skilled at exploiting legal intricacies or loopholes to earn money, we call that person an expert, a “true understander of the world.” In truth, they have merely anchored themselves in a detail. Another system rewards that behaviour, and we confuse the reward with meaning.
The truly large – the systems that sustain everything – we leave mostly unattended. They appear too complex.
So we remain in the middle layer, where life feels orderly, and where neither the upper nor the lower layer becomes visible. Once we have built walls around this layer, nothing remains permeable.
Consider capitalism. A big word. Depending on the perspective, it is called an economic system, a cultural form, a way of thinking. It writes itself into structures and into people’s minds.
Viewed from above, it appears dysfunctional: more and more people have less and less, yet are expected to consume more so that the system continues. This cannot be sustained, regardless of the perspective one chooses.
But we rarely work at that level.
We ensure only that capitalism, in our comfortable middle layer, does not disturb anything that seems familiar and stable. We defend the layer we inhabit, and focus on the details we can handle.
Then comes the pronoun we.
A word used whenever responsibility is meant to remain unclear. The large we: “we humans.” The smaller versions: “we here,” “we as a group.” Even the microscopic: “we cells,” “we particles.”
We appears wherever no one wishes to be addressed directly.
The essential point remains:
I am responsible for ensuring that I am well. Only then can I contribute anything.
Of course I do not exist in isolation. I live in a world shaped by others. But the perspective matters: only when I perceive my own world can I understand what I am changing.
What remains is a picture of how we think: fragmented, searching, narrowed in perspective, and at the same time open to movement.
This podcast is intended as a place for such movements.
I hope we take good care of ourselves, and that you do the same for yourself.
Further Connections on ausderLiebe.com
– Cultural Interactions
– Dialogues and Interactions
– In Resonance
– Concepts in Resonance
– Knowledge within the Permea-Spectrum
– ausderLiebe Into the World
– About ausderLiebe
Book:
Love? Not an Option – A Conceptual System for the Permeability of Being
https://ausderliebe.com/publications/#book
(relevance: central point of orientation)
Links extern:
Storm im Wasserglas – Homepage of the Podcast
https://stormimwasserglas.de
(source of the episode)
Andersen Storm – Artist Profile
https://andersenstorm.com
(The Author’s Wesite)
Leave a Reply